print-friendly

Daily Life & Activities / Entertainment & Media

Constructing a Language: A Look at Invented Tongues

language

IStock Photo 11783045 © Marek Uliasz

Many of the 2010 Best Picture Oscar nominees had something in common: a focus on language. Much of The Hurt Locker (the winner) is spoken in Arabic; some of District 9, in Afrikaans. The plot of Inglourious Basterds hinges on characters’ ability (or inability) to understand multiple languages. Up gives dogs the ability to speak, and both District 9 and Avatar feature made-up languages. District 9’s is essentially gibberish, but Na’vi, the language spoken in Avatar, is different. It’s “real.” It has grammar, syntax, and a vocabulary of about 1,000 words. But only one person in the world can speak the language: Paul Frommer, the man who made it up.

Probably the most widely known language maker is L.L. Zamenhof. You may not recognize the name, but you’ve probably heard of his creation: Esperanto.

Zamenhof grew up in Bialystok in the mid-1800s—then a Russian town, today a part of Poland. He considered Bialystok to be divided by language: its citizens spoke Polish, German, Yiddish, or Russian, but few were fluent in more than one. Life was unwaveringly tense. As he put it, “The diversity of languages is the first, or at least the most influential, basis for the separation of the human family into groups of enemies.”

And so, Zamenhof decided to undo what Babel had done. In 1887, he published the first Esperanto grammar book.

He’d created a sort of Slavic-Romance mix, with highly regular spelling and grammar. Zamenhof intended his language to be unambiguous and very easy to learn, and it is. An institute in Germany conducted a study of French high school language-learners and determined they took to Esperanto the quickest, in about 150 hours. By comparison, it took the high schoolers 1,000 hours to get comfortable in Italian, 1,500 hours for English, and 2,000 for German.

Today, Esperanto is spoken as a second language by hundreds of thousands—some estimate millions—of people, in over 100 countries. It has the added distinction of having about 2,000 native speakers, taught from birth.

Prior to Esperanto—which more or less changed the ballgame—plenty of other creative people engineered languages of their own. Notables included Thomas Urquhart (translator of Rabelais) and Gottfried Leibniz (philosopher and co-inventor of calculus). Urquhart’s was a bust; so was Leibniz’s, but he had the luck to accidentally establish the field of binary numbers in the process.

John Wilkins—creator of the metric system, first secretary of the Royal Society, and all-around genius—created his own, known as Real Character. The symbols come from no existing language (they look totally alien at first), the words can be any length and made up as needed, and the spelling is taxonomic. This means that a word’s spelling acts like the classification scheme you know from biology class (kingdom, phylum, class, order...)—a word’s first two letters put it in a broad category (called a genus), and each subsequent letter narrows the idea. So if de means “element,” deb might mean fire, deba the flame itself, and so on. Real Character was intended to be a universal language of the sciences. Understandably, it did not catch on.

Today, constructed languages exist all over the world, most of them spoken by small but highly active populations of hobbyists, linguists, and occasionally native speakers. (Click here for an incomplete but mind-blowing list.) Esperanto is probably the most successful. UNESCO recognizes it as an official tongue. It has its own flag. It’s even been featured in a few movies: before he was Captain Kirk, William Shatner starred in a movie done entirely in Esperanto. But lately, a popular trend in constructed languages has been to specially make them for movies. Like Na’vi.

In 2006, Paul Frommer, a professor of communications at USC, was approached by James Cameron to create a language—a realistic but exotic-sounding language—for the blue humanoid aliens in Avatar. Cameron gave Frommer a list of few dozen “example” words, words he’d made up that captured the sound he wanted for the alien language. To Frommer they sounded Polynesian. From them, he created a full, systematic language for the Na’vi, complete with a 27-letter alphabet, noun inflections, verb conjugations, a defined grammar, and a 1,000-word lexicon. He also taught the cast how to speak it, though none of the actors became remotely fluent. Currently, only Frommer is. He has plans to release a Na’vi dictionary.

Movies and books have seen the creation of some of the wildest and most unique languages of the 20th century. J.R.R. Tolkien, a linguist by trade, created more than a dozen written and spoken languages for The Hobbit and his Lord of the Rings trilogy. Most are runic or Scandinavian in one way or another, and several can be heard in the movie trilogy. Another language created for the movies—but, unlike Tolkien’s, essentially used and forgotten—is Mondoshawan, created for The Fifth Element. Actress Milla Jovovich speaks it throughout the picture; she and director (and now, ex-husband) Luc Besson created it together, even writing letters to each other in it.

And there’s Klingon, that constantly cited example of alien-speak. Created for Star Trek III: The Search for Spock by linguist Marc Okrand, it was deliberately designed to sound abrasive and guttural. The language uses almost all consonants, much like some Native American dialects. Complicating the use of Klingon—and yes, many use it, and about a dozen are fluent in it—is its grammar: most words are war- or technology-related, making it difficult to discuss the weather or to ask where the bathroom is. Other complex rules—backwards sentence formation, no adjectives, no verb for “to be,” and few color-words—make translating from Klingon a task for the stout-hearted.

That goes double for translating to Klingon. But for the truly hard-core speaker, several literary masterpieces have been translated into the language. The most notable is Hamlet, which was translated into warrior-speak after Star Trek VI depicted a Klingon (actor Christopher Plummer) periodically rattling off Shakespeare. He recites it in English, but the in-joke is that he is translating from “the original Klingon.”

How does the Bard sound in the original Klingon? Hamlet’s immortal dilemma, “To be, or not to be—that is the question,” becomes the somewhat rockier “taH pagh taHbe’—DaH mu’tlheghvam vIqelnIS!”

Click here to see our top five invented tongues.

Read More Articles

Open/Close

Sources

 

Binary numeral system [Internet]. Wikipedia.org. [accessed March 23, 2010]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_numeral_system

List of constructed languages [Internet]. Wikipedia.org. [accessed March 23, 2010]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_constructed_languages

Incubus clip—William Shatner speaking Esperanto [Internet]. YouTube LLC. [accessed March 23, 2010]. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F77k6SQX7iQ

Edwards G. Dejpu’bogh Hov rur qablli!. Wired. August 1996:1.

Sancton J. Brushing Up on Na’vi, the Language of Avatar. Vanity Fair. December 2009:1.

Native Esperanto as a test case for natural language [Internet]. University of Helsinki. [accessed March 23, 2010]. Available from: http://www.vanityfair.com/online/oscars/2009/12/brushing-up-on-navi-the-language-of-avatar.html

Lewis M. Esperanto: A Language of Poland. In: Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Lewis M. editor. Dallas, TX: SIL International; 2009:Book.

Borges J. The Analytical Language of John Wilkins. In: Other Inquisitions, 1937-1952. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press; 1975:Book.

Shakespeare W. The Klingon Hamlet . Nicholas N. and Strader A. (trans.) editor. New York: Pocket Books; 1996:Book.

Open/Close

Comments (14)

Sort:
anonymous
Comment

Very nice site!

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

Very nice site! cheap cialis http://opeyixa.com/rvqvxvx/4.html

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

Very nice site! [url=http://opeyixa.com/rvqvxvx/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

Very nice site! <a href="http://opeyixa.com/rvqvxvx/1.html">cheap viagra</a>

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

Hello! gfbefda interesting gfbefda site! I'm really like it! Very, very gfbefda good!

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

The creator of Klingon is Marc Okrand (not Okerman).

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

My apologies, I was the one who put the comments describing Esperanto, Ido, Interlingua, etc. I'm Marian Ghilea.

report abuse
zturpin
Comment

Thanks, anonymous, whoever you or you all may be! You Esperantists and Idists, Interlinguists and Lojbanists, and conlang folks in general, are an informative, thoughtful bunch -- koran dankon.

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

About extensivity - from the few hundred roots, Esperanto has developed over 100 thousand words. Anything you can imagine in a natural language can be also imagined/told in Esperanto. Ido and Interlingua are comparable.
Artistic languages are usually much more limited in vocabulary. They were designed for a context and normally you only have words for that context. Nav'i, for example, has about 1000 words. Insufficient to write a book in it, for example, but OK to have some phrases used in a movie.

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

Well, about Esperanto, studies have shown that it takes from 1/4 to 1/20 of the standard time to learn any other language (it was designed to be very easy to learn). It took me about 6 months during high school to speak it fluently (i.e. reading books with no dictionary and being able to talk about anytihng), but I studied intermittently and didn't have good textbooks. I think organized study can reduce it to about 2-3 months. On http://www.lernu.net one can learn Esperanto for example. Resources for Ido, Interlingual Glosa, etc, can be found with a google search.
Ido, as an offspring of Esperanto is also easy to study. Interlingua is easiest to understand if one speaks more than one romance language, but is not so regular. Auxiliary languages such as Esperanto are designed to be a means of communication, so they are easy to learn.
Artistic languages, such as Nav'i, Klingon, Quenya, etc - are meant for artistic expression and often can be more difficult to learn than natural languages.
Also, experimental languages, such as Lojban are certainly more complicated than natural languages.

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

Well, about Esperanto, studies have shown that it takes from 1/4 to 1/20 of the standard time to learn any other language (it was designed to be very easy to learn). It took me about 6 months during high school to speak it fluently (i.e. reading books with no dictionary and being able to talk about anytihng), but I studied intermittently and didn't have good textbooks. I think organized study can reduce it to about 2-3 months. On http://www.lernu.net one can learn Esperanto for example. Resources for Ido, Interlingual Glosa, etc, can be found with a google search.
Ido, as an offspring of Esperanto is also easy to study. Interlingua is easiest to understand if one speaks more than one romance language, but is not so regular. Auxiliary languages such as Esperanto are designed to be a means of communication, so they are easy to learn.
Artistic languages, such as Nav'i, Klingon, Quenya, etc - are meant for artistic expression and often can be more difficult to learn than natural languages.
Also, experimental languages, such as Lojban are certainly more complicated than natural languages.

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

How long does it take to learn one of these languages? Are they extensive as English? Or do they vary?

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

For those interested in further reading about constructed languages, I would suggest Arika Okrent's book, _In The Land of Invented Languages_. She is a linguist and has taken the time to actually immerse herself in Esperanto and Klingon, as well as researching quite a few others. Her coverage of the subject is not exhaustive, but it is an interesting tour.

http://inthelandofinventedlanguages.com/

report abuse
anonymous
Comment

As a polyglot and esperantist, I enjoyed reading your article. Besides Esperanto (by far the most succesful engineered language) and the oned already described in the text, one could also mention Interlingua and Ido as languages that have a decent no. of speakers. Also, interesting choices are Glosa, Lingua Franca Nova, Toki Pona, Lojban or Kobaian (the last one invented by the group Magma to sing their songs in during late 70-s and early 80-s). Slovio and Nordien are also interesting creations. Web searches by names would give anyone more details.
Sed finfine, Esperanto restas la plej interesa, miaopinie, el chiuj artefaritaj lingvoj.

report abuse

Post a comment

Related Odds

In order to login please fill in your username with password.

Forgot your username or password?

Join our community and personalize your Book of Odds experience!

Create your Book of Odds